लेखक परिचय

जगदीश्‍वर चतुर्वेदी

जगदीश्‍वर चतुर्वेदी

वामपंथी चिंतक। कलकत्‍ता वि‍श्‍ववि‍द्यालय के हि‍न्‍दी वि‍भाग में प्रोफेसर। मीडि‍या और साहि‍त्‍यालोचना का वि‍शेष अध्‍ययन।

Posted On by &filed under राजनीति.


आरएसएस के पूर्व सरसंघसंचालक के.सी. सुदर्शन साहब दो दिन पहले भोपाल में बोले और खूब बोले। किसी को उनके बोलने पर आपत्ति नहीं है। उन्हें भारत के धर्मनिरपेक्ष कानून और संविधान ने यह अधिकार दिया है वे और उनके अनुयायी इसका उपयोग करें।

मजेदार बात यह है स्वतंत्र भारत के इतिहास में यह पहला मौका था जब आरएसएस के लोगों पर आतंकी घटनाओं में शामिल होने के आरोप लगे हैं। उनकी गिरफ्तारियां हुई हैं और अदालत में चार्जशीट भी दाखिल हुई हैं। आरएसएस का मानना है उसके लोगों को राजनीतिक विद्वेष के कारण मिथ्या आरोपों में फंसाया जा रहा है और कांग्रेस उनके खिलाफ मिथ्या प्रचार कर रही है। आरएसएस का चरित्रहनन करने की कोशिश की जा रही है। इस सबके प्रतिवाद में सारे देश में आरएसएस ने 10 नवम्बर 2010 को प्रतिवाद दिवस मनाया। इस मौके पर सभी संघी नेताओं को धरने,प्रदर्शन और जुलूसों में देखा गया और यह आरएसएस को धर्मनिरपेक्ष संविधान ने हक दिया है वे अपने साथ किए जा रहे अन्याय का प्रतिवाद करें।

समस्या यह नहीं है कि आरएसएस क्या है ? समस्या यह है कि आरएसएस के नेता के.सी.सुदर्शन ने इस तरह अशालीन बयान क्यों दिया ? आरएसएस आतंकी है या साम्प्रदायिक है,यह फैसला आसानी से संभव नहीं है। आरएसएस ने आम लोगों में हिन्दुत्व का जितना ज़हरीला प्रचार किया है उसके कारण अनेक लोग तो अब मान ही चुके हैं संघ ही देश का भविष्य है। हिन्दुत्व ही भारत की आत्मा है। हिन्दूराष्ट्र ही भारत के भाग्य का चन्द्रमा है।

के.सी. सुदर्शन के बयान पर कांग्रेस ने हल्ला किया है,वह भी सारे देश में प्रतिवाद करेंगे । मजेदार बात यह है कि कांग्रेस को आतंकी संघ परिवार की हरकतों के खिलाफ प्रतिवादस्वरूप जुलूस निकालने की याद नहीं आयी ,लेकिन सोनिया गांधी के बारे में के.सी. सुदर्शन के बयान पर प्रतिवाद स्वरूप सड़कों पर उतरने की याद आयी। इससे एक बात तो कम से कम कह सकते हैं कि मसला कांग्रेस के लिए भी हिन्दू आतंकवाद नहीं है। बल्कि सोनिया गांधी के बारे में के.सी. सुदर्शन के द्वारा दिया गया वह घटिया बयान है जिसमें उन्होंने सभ्यता और शालीनता के सभी रिकार्ड तोड़ दिए हैं।

के.सी. सुदर्शन संघ परिवार में गंभीर विचारों के धनी हैं और उनकी सारी इन्द्रियाँ दुरूस्त हैं। उन्होंने पूरे होशोहवास में अपना बयान दिया है और यह बयान संघ परिवार की भावी राजनीतिक कार्रवाईयों के लिए मार्गदर्शक का काम करेगा। इस बयान को हल्के ढ़ंग से नहीं लेना चाहिए। राममंदिर आंदोलन के बाद लंबे अंतराल के बाद संघ परिवार राजनीति के मैदान में आने जा रहा है। 10 नवम्बर का

प्रतिवाद उसकी शुरूआतभर है। इस प्रतिवाद की राजनीतिक मंशाएं राममंदिर आंदोलन से भी ज्यादा गहरी हैं।

हिन्दू आतंकवाद का विरोध करने के बहाने संघ अपने को नए कलेवर में रूपान्तरित करने की तैयारियां कर चुका है। इस राजनीतिक प्रक्रिया में संघ परिवार आने वाले समय में खूब कीचड़ उछालेगा। सोनिया गांधी पर किया गया तथ्यहीन और अशालीन वाचिक हमला आरएसएस के स्वयंसेवकों के लिए हरी झंड़ी है कि जाओ और जो भी मन में आए बको। जितना इच्छा झूठ बोलो। चूंकि असत्य प्रचार का आरंभ संघ के बड़े नेता ने किया है इसलिए अब संघ परिवार के लोग राममंदिर आंदोलन के समय से भी ज्यादा सांस्कृतिक प्रदूषण फैलाएंगे। यह संघ परिवार को आतंकी विचारधारा का कवच पहनाने की बड़ी योजना का हिस्सा है।

संघ परिवार में पहले हिन्दुओं को हजम करने की कोशिश की गयी और जब उसमें सफलता नहीं मिली तो नयी बदली हुई परिस्थितियों में संघ परिवार ने नया राजनीतिक मार्ग ग्रहण किया है और वह है आतंकी हिंसा के आयोजन,संगठन और प्रचार का। सोनिया गांधी पर किया गया वैचारिक हमला इस बड़ी डिजाइन का हिस्सा है।

आरएसएस के लोग जानते हैं कि वे देश के विभिन्न हिस्सों में साम्प्रदायिक हिंसाचार में लिप्त रहे हैं और बड़ी ही चालाकी से वे अपने को इससे अलग दिखाने का प्रयास भी करते रहे हैं। लेकिन गुजरात के जनसंहार के समय से उन्होंने हिंसा से अपने को अलगाने या छिपाने का काम बंद कर दिया है। गुजरात के दंगों के बाद से वे अब खुल्लमखुल्ला खेलने लगे हैं। गुजरात की हिंसा के पहले उनके जो प्रेरक

थे वे भी बदल गए हैं। अब उन्हें जिन तत्वों से प्रेरणा मिल रही है उनका भारत की किसी भी किस्म की राजनीतिक परंपरा से कोई संबंध नहीं है। विश्व में चल रही अलकायदा-तालिबान आदि संगठनों का वायरल बुखार उन्हें भी स्पर्श कर गया है।

संघ अपने बुनियादी कार्यक्रम को बंद नहीं करना चाहता। मीडिया के अनुसार बुनियादी कार्यक्रम है हिंसा और घृणा फैलाना। हिन्दुत्व के नाम पर वे जिस तथाकथित ऐतिहासिक सत्य और तथ्य का प्रचार करते रहे हैं वह अब प्रेरणा देने का काम नहीं कर रहा। नई बदली हुई परिस्थितियों में वे कुछ वैसा करना चाहते हैं जिसकी तुलना हिटलर से न की जाए। मुसोलिनी से न की जाए। वे अपने आलोचकों के द्वारा की गयी पुरानी तुलनाएं सुन-सुनकर बोर हो गए हैं वे अपने लिए नयी तुलनाओं की तलाश में हैं। वे पुरानी हिन्दुत्ववादी की पहचान से बाहर आना चाहते हैं,वे पुराने तौर-तरीकों से बाहर आना चाहते हैं,उन्हें अलकायदा-तालिबान की चमक और दबदबा आकर्षित करने लगा है। उन्हें माओवादियों का हिंसक आचरण अपील करने लगा है। वे अपने संगठन के पास अलकायदा जैसी विश्वव्यापी शक्ति की कल्पना के सपने देख रहे हैं।

वे मानते हैं कि वे साम्प्रदायिक नहीं हैं ,हिन्दू आतंकी नहीं है। इन नामों से उन्हें सम्बोधित नहीं किया जाए। वे अपने नए वैचारिक झंझावात से सभी किस्म के ऐतिहासिक सत्यों पर पर्दा डाल देना चाहते हैं। के.सी. सुदर्शन जब भोपाल में बोल रहे थे तो उनका सारा जोर इसी बात पर था कि संघ परिवार के बारे में जो कुछ भी कहा जा रहा है वह असत्य है। उन्होंने यह भी बताया कि हिन्दू आतंकी कर्म से

उनका कोई लेना देना नहीं है। हो सकता है सुदर्शनजी की बात में सच्चाई हो। लेकिन आज के जमाने में मुश्किल यह है कि मीडिया के जरिए छनकर हम तक हिन्दू आतंक की खबरे पहुँची हैं। ये खबरें किसी ने बनायी नहीं हैं। ये वास्तव खबरें हैं। मीडिया के जरिए ही उन त्रासद घटनाओं के विवरण और ब्यौरे हम तक पहुँचे हैं जिनमें बताया गया है कि संघ परिवार आतंकी बम धमाकों में हाथ था। हो सकता है संघ के हाथ होने वाली बात में सच्चाई न हो। लेकिन उस त्रासद घटना को असत्य नहीं कहा जा सकता।

हमें हिन्दुत्ववादी संगठनों की हिस्सेदारी वाली घटनाओं के लक्षणों और प्रवृत्तियों पर गंभीरता के साथ विचार करना चाहिए। हो सकता है संघ परिवार के लोग प्रमाणों के अभाव में आतंकी घटनाओं से बरी हो जाएं। लेकिन वे उस सत्य से बरी नहीं हो सकते जो उनके साथ जुड़ गया है। उनके साथ नया सत्य है आतंकी का। इस कलंक को वे धा नहीं पाएंगे।

संघ परिवार के लोग जानते हैं कि अदालत में प्रमाणित सत्य से बड़ा सामाजिक सत्य होता है। आज के युग में सत्य मीडिया निर्मित यथार्थ है। मीडिया सत्य यह है कि आरएसएस धीरे धीरे अपना हिन्दुत्व का मुखौटा त्यागकर दूसरा मुखौटा खोज रहा है। बतर्ज सीबीआई और कांग्रेस नेताओं के संघ ने अपने लिए हिन्दू आतंकी का मुखौटा चुन लिया है। इस मुखौटे को संघ परिवार क्या जल्दी ही अपने चेहरे से हटा पाएगा ? जी नहीं। महात्मा गांधी की हत्या के बाद जो मुखौटा मीडिया ने संघ को पहनाया था उससे आज तक वे मुक्त नहीं हो पाए हैं। राममंदिर आंदोलन ने जो मुखौटा पहनाया था उसे वे अभी तक उतार नहीं पाए हैं। अब कई आतंकी हमलों की घटनाओं में संघ परिवार के लोगों के नाम आए हैं उससे संघ को एक नया मुखौटा मिला है और इसे भी जल्दी उतारना उनके लिए संभव नहीं है। हमें ध्यान रखना चाहिए मीडिया जो मुखौटा पहना देता है उसे आप चाहकर भी नहीं उतार सकते।

संघ परिवार अपने मुखौटों से तब ही मुक्त हो सकता है जब वह संबंधित मसले और व्यक्तियों को पूरी तरह त्याग दे। जिन लोगों का हिंसाचार में नाम आया है उन्हें सीने से लगाए रखने से मीडिया का मिथ पुख्ता बनेगा।

संघ परिवार के लोग जानते हैं कि उनके आदमी ने क्या किया है ? वे यह भी जानते हैं कि एकबार मीडिया में कलंक का टीका लग जाने के बाद लाख कोशिशें करने के बाबजूद भी साफ होने वाला नहीं है।

संघ वाले कितना ही हल्ला मचाएं बाबरी मसजिद को ढहाए जाने के अपराध से वे मुक्त नहीं हो सकते भले ही उनके पक्ष में अदालत का फैसला आ जाए। सच को आप किसी साबुन से धोकर साफ नहीं कर सकते। सच सच है उसे संघ के धरने,प्रदर्शन बदल नहीं सकते। सच को लोग भूलते नहीं हैं। वह स्मृति में रहता है। सामाजिक चेतना में रहता है।

सोनिया गांधी के बारे में सुदर्शनजी ने जो कुछ कहा है वह पूर्णतः असत्य है। असत्य बोलकर सत्य की सृष्टि नहीं की जा सकती। हिटलर से लेकर अलकायदा तक असत्य को सत्य और सत्य को असत्य बनाने में लगे हैं लेकिन उन्हें सफलता नहीं मिली है। संघ परिवार के लोग गुजरात में चुनाव जीत सकते हैं लेकिन गुजरात में हुई हिंसा के कलंक से अपने को मुक्त नहीं कर सकते।

सत्य सबसे बड़ा होता है ,भाषण,मीडिया, संगठन, सरकार, हिन्दुत्व ,आतंकवाद, भगवा आतंकवाद आदि से बड़ा होता है। संघ परिवार को साहस दिखाकर उन आतंकी घटनाओं के सत्य का उदघाटन करना चाहिए जिनमें वे शामिल बताए जा रहे हैं। वे सत्य की तलाश नहीं कर रहे बल्कि यह कह रहे हैं कि संघ पर हिन्दू आतंक का आरोप गलत है। हो सकता है यह आरोप गलत हो। लेकिन यह आरोप सही भी हो सकता है । ऐसी स्थिति में क्या करेंगे ?

संघ परिवार की मुश्किल यह है कि वह मीडिया निर्मित इमेजों में घिर गया है। इमेजों में घिरने के बाद उनके बाहर निकलना असंभव है। दूसरी बात यह है कि अपराध और दण्ड में कोई समानता नहीं होती। संघ वाले अपराधी करार दिए जाएंगे तो क्या इससे किसी को राहत मिलेगी ? चैन मिलेगा ? अपराध का क्या सजा के साथ समान रूप में विनिमय संभव है ? जी नहीं।

हमारा समाज मीडिया निर्मित मिथकों के युग में दाखिल हो चुका है। अब मीडिया ही सारी घटनाओं को निर्मित करता है। वही मिथ बनाता है। इस अर्थ में वर्तमान समय मीडिया निर्मित मिथकों से भरा है। मीडिया मिथ इसलिए सफल हैं क्योंकि उनमें लक्ष्यीभूत संगठन,समूह,विचारधारा आदि को शामिल कर लिया जाता है।

हिन्दू आतंकी या भगवा आतंकी के मिथ में जब एकबार संघ परिवार को मीडिया ने शामिल कर दिया है तो उस इमेज से बाहर निकलना असंभव है। मीडिया ने इस चक्कर में आतंकी अपराध को भी धार्मिक मिथ बना दिया है। यह काम उसने इस्लाम के संदर्भ में किया है,ईसाई और सिख धर्म के संदर्भ में किया है और अब वह यह काम हिन्दू धर्म के संदर्भ में भी कर रहा है। इस क्रम में मीडिया सबसे पहले ऐतिहासिक यथार्थ को पूरी तरह नष्ट कर देता है। चीजें ऐतिहासिक तौर पर रहेंगी तो मिथ बनाने में असुविधा होती है। नया मीडिया हथकंडा है ऐतिहासिकता को नष्ट करो ,फिर मिथ बनाओ। संघ के लोग अपने इतिहास को लेकर घूम रहे हैं लेकिन उसका कोई दाम नहीं है। कोई सुनने वाला नहीं है।

नया संसार ऐसा है जिसमें अतीत की समस्त कल्पना और फैंटेसियों का वैभव गायब हो चुका है। हिंसा और यथार्थ की समस्त पूंजी गायब है। मसलन युवाओं की इसमें कोई दिलचस्पी नहीं है कि बाबरी मसजिद किसने गिरायी, गुजरात में दंगे किसने किए,दंगा पीडित कैसे हैं इत्यादि इत्यादि। यह हिंसा और यथार्थ की पूंजी के लोप का ही परिणाम है कि नरेन्द्र मोदी गुजरात का नायक है। माओवादी हीरो हैं।

कहने का अर्थ है मौजूदा दौर में मीडिया ने यथार्थ को विभ्रम में बदल दिया है। सुदर्शन जी इस सत्य को जानते हैं। हम लाख प्रमाण दें संघ ऐसा है वैसा है,कोई सुनने वाला नहीं है क्योंकि यथार्थ का इस दौर में लोप हो चुका है। आज की वास्तविकता है यथार्थ का लोप। यथार्थ का लोप ही आज का सबसे बड़ा यथार्थ है।

अब ऐसे बयान दिए जा रहे हैं जिनका वास्तविकता से कोई संबंध नहीं है। सुदर्शन जी के बयान की भी यही दशा है उसका सोनिया गांधी के जीवन की वास्तविकता से कोई संबंध नहीं है। वे जो बातें कह रहे हैं वे सब कल्पना की बातें हैं।

ध्यान रहे यह अंतहीन मुर्दा बयानों का दौर है। मीडिया में अंतहीन मुर्दा बयानों का सिलसिला बना हुआ है। ये बयान किसी भी दल के हों,इनका अंतहीन सिलसिला बना रहेगा। अब संचार नहीं हो रहा है,अंतहीन संचार हो रहा है। मीडिया में मुर्दा बयानों की बाढ़ आयी हुई है। सुदर्शनजी का बयान भी एक मुर्दा बयान है। मुर्दा बयानों में सत्य नहीं होता।

14 Responses to “मीडिया में मुर्दा बयानों की बाढ़”

  1. अहतशाम "अकेला"

    चतुर्वेदी जी आप क्यों जले पे नमक छिड़कते हो ..हाआआआआआअ
    दरअसल आरएसएस वाले बौखला गए हैं क्यूंकि इनकी काली करतूत जो जनता के सामने आ गई है

    इन्हें ये नहीं पता की-
    (आसमान का थूका मुह पर ही आ गिरता है)

    Reply
  2. दिवस दिनेश गौड़

    Er. Diwas Dinesh Gaur

    खुद भले ही कौंग्रेस को सौ गालियाँ दे दो, किन्तु यदि यही काम कोई संघी या भाजपाई करे तो उसका बयान मुर्दा?
    सच तो यह है की मार्क्सवाद अब मुर्दा होने वाला है|

    Reply
  3. Vinay Dewan

    जगदीश भाई ( भाई उपयुक्त है आप प्रवक्ता के डोन जो ठहरे ) आप जानते हैं कोन आतंकी है कोन नहीं !!! लेकिन जिनको आप ये बताने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं वो जानते हैं की असली आतंकी कोन है | लेकिन आप लिखे, आपको चिंता करने की जरूरत नहीं क्योंकि कांग्रेस रहे या नहीं रहे आप जरूर रहेंगे| हो सकता है कई और दलों और दलदलों को आपकी जरूरत रहेगी|

    Reply
  4. Janmay Jain

    राकेश जी बिलकुल आपने सही किया इस लेख को यंहा दे कर पूरा लेख अब Dr. Subramanian Swamy ने अपनी पोलिटिकल पार्टी बना कर उसके वेब पेज पर ही पुब्लिश कर दिया है, ये सुदर्शन जी तो बहुत देर से कहे वो भी तब जब कोंग्रेसियों ने इनपर किचर डाला तब, अगर कोंग्रेसियों में हिम्मत है तो Dr. Subramanian Swamy पर केस फाइल करे, ये रहा http://janataparty.org/sonia.html उनके वेब का पता . अगर कोंग्र्सियों ने कुछ भी नहीं किया इस विषय में तो जनता को इसे सच मानना चाहिए. एक बार जरुर पढ़ें, चतुर्वेदी जी भी इस पर कुछ प्रकाश डालें, अगर सच कहने की हिम्मत है तो :

    Do You Know Your Sonia Gandhi?
    by
    Dr. Subramanian Swamy
    (National President, Janatha Party)

    INTRODUCTION
    THREE LIES
    SONIA’S INTRODUCTION INTO INDIA
    SONIA’S KGB CONNECTIONS
    SONIA’S CONTEMPT FOR LAWS OF INDIA
    SONIA GANDHI IS THE MODERN ROBERT CLIVE
    WHAT PATRIOTIC INDIANS CAN DO

    Reply
  5. mukesh

    आपने मान लिया की संघ ने हिन्दुत्व को हर हिन्दू को गर्व से हिन्दू कहना सिखा दिया है, यही संघ को करना था, आपको बधाई धन्यवाद! वन्देमातरम

    Reply
  6. Him Gupta

    माननीय सुदर्शन जी ने बिल्कुल सही बात को ठीक ठंग से तथा ठीक समय पर कहा है। अमेरिकी सत्ता तथा सीआईए सहित उसके सारे अंग चर्च का पोषण करते है। सोनिया भी चर्च के हितो के लिए भारतीय सत्ता का उपयोग कर रही है। अतः यदि हम कम शब्दो में काफी कुछ कहना चाहते है तो सोनिया को सीआईए एजेण्ट कहना ही होगा।

    अब चर्च की निति को समझे। वह दक्षिण एसिया मे हिन्दु, मुसलमानो तथा वमपंथीयो मे शाश्वत द्वन्द चाहती है। उसके उल्ट हमे समझना होगा की इस द्वन्द का समाधान ही अखण्डता के निर्माण का रास्ता है। संघ ईतिहास के एक बहुत ही निर्णायक मोड पर खडा है। स्थितिया बिल्कुल साफ है। नितियो और कार्यशैली मे परिवर्तन आवश्यक हैं। मुसलमानो तथा वामपंथीयो पर शब्द-बाण चलाना बंद करना होगा – सदभाव निर्माण की कोशीश होनी चाहिए। अगर संघ का प्रबुद्ध वर्ग भी इस बात को नही समझता तो फिर यह मानना होगा की संघ भी सीआईए का अंग बनता जा रहा है।

    Reply
  7. abhishek1502

    एक टिप्पड़ी में सोनिया गाँधी का सच बताया गया है उस का कोई जवाब नही आया .
    संघ पर चाहे जितने हमले कर लो हम हर मुश्किल चीर कर आगे बढ़ते जायेगे .
    चतुर (वेदी ) जी संघ की छोडिये ये बताईये की वामपंथ की सड़ी गली बात कोई क्यों सुनने वाला नही है ???????
    क्यों भारत में वामपंथ अपनी अंतिम सांसे गिन रहा है ????????///
    उन पर मंथन करिए संघ पर हमला करने से कुछ भी नही मिलेगा

    Reply
  8. विजय प्रकाश सिंह

    अब तो सोनिया गांधी पर फोकस आ ही गया | सच या झूठ यह तो समय ही तय करेगा लेकिन कांग्रेसी किताना भी शोर मचाएं , जितनी जांच के घेरे में संघ रहेगा उतनी ही विवाद में कांग्रेस | अपुष्ट तथ्यों का जवाब दे पाना दोनों के लिए एक सा होगा | शायद अति उत्साह में केन्द्रीय कांग्रेसी राजनीतिक रणनीतिकारों ने संघ के लिए गड्ढा खोदा और अब उसी तरह के जवाब का शिकार ओ रहे हैं | यह कुछ मझे कांग्रेसियों ( हिंदुत्व वादी ) की चाल भी हो सकती है कि राहुल इस लोक सभा में प्रधान मंत्री न बन पायें | मतलब संघ को इतना भडकाओ कि पलट वार करे और यह छीछालेदर हो |

    परन्तु कोई बात नहीं, चतुर्वेदी जी आप लोगों के तो मजे हैं इस लड़ाई से , माओ वाद से फोकस शायद हट जाय , जिसे मनमोहन जी देश की आतंरिक सुरक्षा के लिए सबसे बड़ा खतरा मानते हैं और चीन से भी जिसे बुजुर्ग समाज वादी जार्ज फर्नांडीस ने सबसे बड़ा बाहरी खतरा बताया था और दूसरे समाज वादी मुलायम सिंह का आरोप है कि वह आक्रमण करने ही वाला है | ये दोनों ही पूर्व डिफेन्स मिनिस्टर रहे हैं और जरूर तथ्यों पर आधारित विचार व्यक्त किया होगा |

    Reply
  9. श्रीराम तिवारी

    shriram tiwari

    अंतहीन मुर्दा वयानी के दौर में मीडिया निर्मित आभासी छवि से – हिदू आतंकवाद यथार्थ का रूप और आकर लेता जा रहा है …यह स्वयम हिन्दुओं और खास तौर से भारत के हित में नहीं है ….कांग्रेस एक सत्तालोलुपों की पूंजीवादी दलाल पार्टी बनकर रह गई है .यही वजह है की उस पार्टी की अध्यक्ष -श्रीमती सोनिया गाँधी पर अकेले सुदर्शन ही नहीं बल्कि दक्षिण पंथी असहिष्णु हिन्दू कतारों में वैयक्तिक दुर्भावना गहरे तक घर बना चुकी है ,और ये तत्वोंमादी श्रीमती सोनिया गाँधी पर हमले क्यों कर रहे हैं ..फिलहाल यह शोध का विषय होना चाहिए ….कहीं केन्द्रीय सरकार से भाजपा का लगातार बाहर रहना और आगामी लोकसभा चुनावों में भी नाउम्मीद होने की वजह तो नहीं ?हालाँकि संघियों के दस्तावेजों में मुस्लिम ,इसाई ,वौद्ध ,जैन ,सिख ,कांग्रेस ,अजा -जज़ाऔर वामपंथ के खिलाफ भयंकर जहर उगला गया है .सुदर्शन जो पढेंगे वही तो बकेंगे .
    भले बुरे सब एक से ,जो लों बोलत नाहिं…
    जानि परत हैं काक -पिक ,ऋतू वसंत के माह ….

    Reply
  10. सुरेश चिपलूनकर

    Suresh Chiplunkar

    राकेश जी… किससे जवाब की अपेक्षा कर रहे हैं, चतुर्वेदी जी से?

    ये सिर्फ़ उल्टी करना जानते हैं… किसी को जवाब नहीं देते… और दूसरों से ये साहब अपेक्षा रखते हैं कि वह आम आदमी की भाषा में बात ना करे, बल्कि फ़र्जी प्रोफ़ेसरों की भाषा में लिखे…

    सुब्रहमण्यम स्वामी के सवालों, तथ्यों और कागज़ातों का कोई जवाब यहाँ कांव-कांव करने वाले किसी वामपंथी और सेकुलर के पास नहीं है…

    मजे की बात यह है कि जब-जब कांग्रेस परेशानी में घिरती है या उसका तीखा विरोध होता है, तो चमचागिरी और बचाव में सबसे पहले वामपंथी उतरते हैं…

    चतुर्वेदी जी, सुदर्शन जी को कोस रहे हैं, लेकिन आज तक खुद इन्होंने कांग्रेस के खिलाफ़ एक भी उल्लेखनीय काम करके नहीं दिखाया है… इनकी सारी उम्र सिर्फ़ और सिर्फ़ चमचागिरी में बीती है जिसका “रिवार्ड” भी इन्हें मिल चुका है…

    यदि इनमें थोड़ी भी शर्म बची हो तो हम जैसे “आम आदमी” को न सही, डॉ स्वामी को ही जवाब देकर दिखायें… लेकिन ऐसा होगा नहीं… क्योंकि डॉ स्वामी से भिड़ने के लिये शेर का कलेजा चाहिये, जो कांग्रेसियों में तो नहीं ही है, सोनिया के चमचे चतुर्वेदी जी में भी नहीं है…

    Reply
  11. Rakesh Kumar

    KNOW SONIA GANDHI
    A Visit to Sonia Gandhi’s Birth Place
    Originally Published By Aravind G 06/02/2003 At 13:47
    Reference URL : http://udayms.wordpress.com/2007/04/25/know-sonia-p2/

    Yes, I am speaking here of Sonia Maino, the alien, non-Hindu widow of the late Rajiv Roberto Gandhi, hell bent to destroy India’s culture, religion and its people.

    A Visit to Orbassano, Sonia’s Birth Place It has been a great tragedy that for the last several centuries our people have been kept in the dark about the true identity of our rulers. I am not speaking here of our common people who, in great measure, have been denied education and literacy, induced to lay down their lives in battles, almost like mercenaries; I am speaking here of our so called educated men who are more eager to know about lesbianism, an Islamic phenomenon, born in harems, than about the antecedents of their own foreign-born rulers. The thing has deteriorated so much that the entire country happily romps around today, with a foreign born woman of unknown pedigree. Yes, I am speaking here of Sonia Maino, the alien, non-Hindu widow of the late Rajiv Roberto Gandhi, hell bent to destroy India’s culture, religion and its people.

    Did you notice that we are never told about the roots of Sonia, her background, her family, how many brothers and sisters she has, the name of her father, his profession, which town or village she comes from, in small little things that familiarize the people with the self-appointed ruler by virtue of an accidental wedding abroad? In India, we are not told the name of Rajiv’s paternal grandfather or how did the universal uncle Jawahar Lal died or wherefrom did the adjunct ‘Nehru’ come from! Moti Lal’s father’s name was Ganga Dhar; why then Moti Lal was not named Moti Lal Dhar? And so on and so forth; we have
    a great deal of unknowns to discover and be familiar with. I therefore set out to discover myself the small village where Sonia hails from.

    After some inquiries, I discovered that Sonia was born some 52 years ago in the small village called Orbassano, just outside Turin (called Torino in Italian), in the north of the country, at the foothills of the Alps.)”

    “The next night I invited the two Italian getlemen to dine with me. I asked them what they knew about the love affair between Rajiv (il presidente indiano), a Mohammedan boy and Sonia, a thoroughbred ‘cattolica’ of Orbassano. Didn’t her father have anything to say to this inter-faith marriage? I was told that Sonia’s father, a simple man named Stephano Maino, used to be a staunch fascist (never mind Sonia’s leftist stance today) and supporter of Benito Mussolini, the dictator of Italy then. Stephano was an upcoming party-man at the time. He was among those hoodlums who used to round up leftists and force feed them with bottles of Castor oil. This was common at the time, all over Italy. The men would vomit and foul their pants, would be ridiculed in public and punished by long jail sentences so that their will could be broken. And in due course Stephano rose in ranks and eventually was sent to the eastern front to fight the Russians. He was captured and had to pass many months in Russian prison camps where he, for the first time came in touch with Russian women jail-keepers with names like Sonia and Marouchka. It was after his return from the front, after the war was over, that Stephano returned home in Orbassano and sired the two daughters, whom he named with Russian names, Sonia and Marouchka. He became a contractor of some sort and no longer a party-man; there was no party then!

    On the subject of the inter-religious marriage with Rajiv, the ‘indiano’, I was told that Stephano was too angry at first to give his blessing to the marriage. At the beginning, Rajiv denied his Islamic roots and blabbered something on his being a Parsee. He explained how the Parsees in India are very liberal. He cited the names of Ratan Tata and several others, even of those who had married French Catholic ladies without giving up their Parsee faith. The implication was that by virtue of the fact that Rajiv’s father Feroz’s mother used to be a Parsee woman (and that was prior to her niakaah), Rajiv too could marry Sonia sans relinquishing his Mohammedan creed. The problem that the nitwit Rajiv did not think about is that a man’s faith is NOT determined by the religion of the mother and even more so when she changes her creed, just prior to wedding as Feroz’s mother had done; she had become a Mohammedan woman at the time of her nikaah with the Sunni Mohammedan Nawab Khan. If Feroz is a Parsee then Pataudi and Ayesha Sultana’s (aka Sharmila Tagore) son Seif Ali (the sword of Ali) is also a Hindu. However, Stephano was smart enough to call the bluff of Rajiv, who never has been known to be intelligent. From the BCCI, Bofors and the submarine deals, he has dropped the load everywhere to great dismay of his supporters. (Those who want to know further, please read up M.O. Mathai’s books My Days With Nehru and Reminiscences of the Nehru Age, if you can at all procure them today.

    There M.O. Mathai (Nehru’s P.A. for more than a decade) tells us of Nehru’s chicanery fooling the Hindus of India when he announced the Vedic marriage between Feroz and Indira. According to Mathai, that was no marriage at all; such inter-faith weddings between Hindus and Mohammedans were illegal and hence, writes Mathai. Indira’s two sons were bastards. India has thus been ruled for so many years by a dynasty of bastards!)

    But the old fashioned Stephano was not ready to listen to Rajiv’s arguments. He said that in order to marry his daughter, Rajiv would have to accept Catholicism and become one. Stephano Maino may not be a Cambridge graduate (but then neither was Rajiv, inspite of all the brouhaha), he did not approve of an inter-faith wedding where his own daughter was a party. And behold, Rajiv became a Catholic. Now, readers! Please remember by this simple act that took place in far away and unknown Orbassano, Rajiv, the grandson of Nawab Khan, the Sunni liquor merchant, became punishable by death! Apostasy is punishable by death in Islam. Measures were taken to keep this information on Rajiv’s change of faith quiet. India’s Mohammedans did not make much noise for the ante was too high. Sonia came to India as Rajiv’s wife, with her father’s blessings, but as an Italian Catholic citizen which she remained for decades.

    She was no burden to her husband. She dabbled in insurance business. Who in India would not run to an insurance agent like Sonia? She was making bags of money in our poor India until the matter was brought to light and such activities were stopped forthwith. Then Rajiv, still an Indian husband of an Italian wife, wily nilly went on with his air plane second pilot’s job until the time came to take over from her assassinated mother. A share of the sins from subsequent mass slaughter of India’s Sikhs bothered Sonia and her advisors (like Mani Shankar Liars et al) suggested garlanding of Bhagat Singh’s pictures in public for an eventual redemption. However, that did not work as we all know.

    No doubt this ragazza (girl, in Italian) has come a long way. She had to become an Indian citizen to enable her husband to become the Prime Minister. We know the subsequent incidents and anecdotes. How the wily Sonia was instrumental in the Pope’s arrival in India after the eye-wash of a fictitious ‘Ganga-cleaning’, which remained unclean even after the Pope had left for the Vatican! It was then that the Catholic couple (they had not done so all these years!) started visiting Hindu temples with vermilion-smeared foreheads, in saris and dhoties. Sonia was made the life-time chair-person of the million-dollar Rajiv Gandhi Fund. Money was coming in like it was no body’s business. From the BCCI, from the Bofors deal, the submarine deal, while Catholic convents were being built with India’s money, some 500 of them, to vie with Mother Teresa. It was at this time of the post-Rajiv period, this young woman went to Japan (please look up the Soka Gakkai International edition of that year) where she lectured that in the matter of divinity both Gandhi and Nehru were of the same level as the Lord Gautama Buddha. At one stroke, the entire Japanese nation was red in anger. And this is the person who in her big expensive book on the late Rajiv, prepared by a hack-writer under the guidance of Sonia, had stated that her knowledge of India was very limited when she first met Rajiv at that Italian eatery in the back streets of Cambridge. Then she knew India to be only a land of snakes and tigers. She had never heard of Gautama Buddha or of Hinduism or even of Islam! The lady has well-paid and competent teachers. Money has always been abundant; even after she had transferred all those millions of dollars from India to London (one would like to know under which law this could be done and by whose orders?) and after the Baring Bank (where she had deposited all the Rajiv Gandhi Fund money) had turned turtle, one wonders who gave permission to replenish all that lost money in full?

    Now she has become a past mistress in chicanery, Sicilian style. Christian Bhil boys rape Christian Bhil women and Hindu boys get the blame for having raped Christian nuns. The false news is broadcast all over the Christian world and our wide-eyed BJP babes-in-the-wood cannot even protest! In faltering Hindi she reads to Hindu listeners that ‘the soil of India is as pure to her as the vermilion of her forehead’; that ‘she would like to breathe her last only in this land of virtue’ and so on and then abruptly turns round, and like an ill-bred street woman starts calling respectable Indian leaders like Vajpayee, ‘a liar’

    (Afterword: Readers! We have not heard the last of this babe. Unless our Gods take care of such insult of our ancient nation by this broad, who also is a fraud, like they had done with the entire Gandhi-Nehru dynasty within the span of a few years, she is going to be a nuisance and our people would have to suffer! Time has come for our people to take notice and to watch every movement of the signora, and NOT leave our affairs totally in the hands of incompetent leaders! She has already dubbed Vajpayee a liar; wait till she comes up with choice Italian swear words for us too! )

    Editor’s Note: This article was first featured on March 8, 1999.

    Reply
  12. Surendra Mohan

    यदि कांग्रेसियों को श्री सुदर्शन की कोई बात से परेशानी है तो वे मुक़दमा क्यों नहीं करते, ताकि तथ्य सामने आयें. वैसे मैं भी मानता हूँ की यह अंतहीन मुर्दा बयानों का दौर है, सबसे अधिक मुर्दा बयान देने वाले साम्यवाद नाम की विरादरी के जीव होते हैं.

    एक बात समझ में नहीं आई की मतिभ्रम के शिकार श्री चौबे जी ने श्री सुदर्शन के बयान को असत्य कैसे ठहरा दिया? किन आधारों पर ?

    Reply
  13. Rakesh Kumar

    अगर सुदर्शन जी ने कहा तो ऐसे ही नहीं कहा होगा, जरुर कहीं न कहीं ये बात कुच्छ हद तक सच होगी ! ज्यादा जानकारी के लिए पढ़ें डॉ. सुब्रमनियम स्वामी द्वारा लिखे इस लेख को जो सुप्रीम कोर्ट में वकील हैं . इन्होंने यह सारी जानकारी उस समय के प्रधान मंत्री अटल जी और गृह मंत्री आडवानी जी को भी दी थी, पर इसे वे इगनोरे कर दिए थे, फिर वो सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अपील दायर भी करने की कोशिश भी की थी जो कोर्ट ने डिसमिस कर दिया इसे पर्सनल गोपिनियता में दखल कह के …..

    Do You Know Your Sonia? By Dr. Subramanian Swamy

    (Originaly Published on: http://agrasen.blogspot.com/2007/08/do-you-know-sonia-gandhi-andor-her.html )

    Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s background as is publicized by her and her Congress Party today, is based on three lies to hide the ugly reality of her life.

    First, her real name is Antonia not Sonia. The Italian Ambassador in New Delhi revealed this in a letter dated April 27, 1983 to the Union Home Ministry which letter has not been made public. Antonia is Sonia’s real name in her birth certificate. Sonia is the name given to her subsequently by her father, Stefano Maino [now deceased] following his return from Russia where he had been a prisoner of war. Stefano had joined the Nazi army as a volunteer. Sonia is a Russian not Italian name. While spending two years in a Russian jail, Sonia’s father had become quite pro-Soviet; especially after the liberating US army in Italy had confiscated all fascists’ properties including his.

    Second, she was not born in Orbassano as she claims in her bio data submitted to Parliament on becoming MP, but in Luciana as stated in her birth certificate. She perhaps would like to hide the place of her birth because of her father’s connection with the Nazis and Mussolini’s Fascists, and her family’s continuing connections with the Nazi-Fascists underground that is still surviving since 1945 in Italy. Luciana is where Nazi-Fascist network is headquartered, and is on the Italian-Swiss border. There can be no other explanation for this otherwise meaningless lie.

    Third, Sonia Gandhi has not studied beyond High School. She has falsely claimed in her affidavit filed as a contesting candidate before the Rae Bareli Returning Officer in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, that she qualified and got a diploma inEnglish from the prestigious University of Cambridge, UK.

    The truth is that Ms. Gandhi has never studied in any college anywhere. She did go to a Catholic nun run seminary-school called Maria Ausiliatrice in Giaveno [15 kms from adopted home town of Orbassabo]. Poverty those days forced young Italian girls to go to such missionaries and then in their teens go to UK to get jobs as cleaning maids, waitresses and au pair. The Mainos were poor those days. Her father was a mason and mother a share cropper.

    Sonia thus went to the town of Cambridge and first learnt some English in a teaching shop called Lennox School [which has since 1970 been wound up]. That is all her “education” is—learnt enough English language to get domestic help jobs. But in Indian society education is highly valued. Thus, to fool the Indian public, Sonia Gandhi willfully fibbed about her qualifications in Parliamentary records [which is a Breach of Ethics Rules] and in a sworn affidavit [which is criminal offence under IPC, severe enough to disqualify her from being MP]. In popular parlance, this is called 420 or 10 “numberi” [not to be confused with 10 Janpath].

    These three lies indicate that Ms. Sonia Gandhi has something to hide, or has a hidden agenda for India. We need to find out more about her.

    III

    Ms. Sonia Gandhi upon learning enough English became a waitress in Varsity Restaurant in Cambridge town. She first met Rajiv when he came to the restaurant in 1965. Rajiv was a student in the University, but could not cope with the academic rigour for long. So he had to depart in 1966 for London where he was briefly in Imperial College of Engineering as a student. Sonia too moved to London, and according my information, got a job with an outfit run by Salman Thassir, a debonair Pakistani based in Lahore, and who has a export-import company headquartered in Dubai but who spends most of his time in London. Thisfits the profile of an ISI functionary.

    Obviously, Sonia made enough money in this job to loan Rajiv funds in London, who was obviously living beyond his allowances [Indira herself expressed anguish to me on this score in late 1965 when she invited me to a private tea at the Guest House in Brandeis University]. Rajiv’s letters to Sanjay, who was also in London then, clearly indicate that he was in financial debt to Sonia because he requested Sanjay who obviously had more access to money, to pay off the debt.

    However, Rajiv was not the only friend Sonia was seeing those days. Madhavrao Scindia and a German by name Stiegler are worth mentioning as other good friends of Sonia. Madhavrao’s friendship continued even after Sonia’s marriage to Rajiv. Scindia in 1982 was involved in a traffic accident near IIT, Delhi main gate while driving a car at 2 AM. Sonia was the only other passenger. Both were badly injured. A student of IIT who was burning midnight oil was out for a cup of coffee. He picked them up from the car, hailed an auto rickshaw and sent an injured Sonia to Mrs Indira Gandhi’s house since she insisted in not going to a hospital. Madhavrao had broken a leg and in too much pain to make any demand. He was taken to hospital by the Delhi Police who had arrived a little after Sonia had left the scene. In later years, Madhavrao had become privately critical of Sonia, and told some close friends about his apprehensions about Sonia. It is a pity that
    he died in mysterious circumstances in an aircrash.

    The circumstance under which Rajiv hastily married Sonia in a Church in Orbassano is controversial but that was his personal matter that has no public significance. But what is of public significance is that Indira Gandhi who was initially dead set against the marriage for reasons known to her, relented to hold a registry marriage with Hindu ceremonial trappings in New Delhi only after the pro-Soviet T.N. Kaul prevailed upon her to accept the marriage in “the larger interest of cementing Indo-Soviet Friendship”. Kaul would not have intervened unless the Soviet Union had asked him to.

    IV

    Such has been the extensive patronage from the beginning extended to Sonia Gandhi from the Soviets. When a Prime Minister of India’s son dates a girl in London, the KGB which valued Indo-Soviet relations, obviously would investigate her and find out that she was the daughter of Stefano, their old reliable Italian contact. Thus, Sonia with Rajiv meant deeper access to the household of the Indian Prime Minister. Hence cementing the Rajiv-Sonia relations was in the Soviet national interest and they went to work on it. And they did through their then existing moles in the Indira Gandhi camp.

    After her marriage to Rajiv, the Soviet connection with the Mainos was fortified and nurtured by generous financial help through commissions and kickbacks on every Indo,Soviet trade deal and defence purchases. According to the respected Swiss magazine, Schweitzer Illustrate [November 1991 issue], Rajiv Gandhi had about $ 2 billion in numbered Swiss bank accounts,which Sonia inherited upon his assassination. Dr. Yevgenia Albats, Ph.D [Harvard], is a noted Russian scholar and journalist, and was a member of the KGB Commission set up by President Yeltsin in August 1991. She was privy to the Soviet intelligence files that documented these deals and KGB facilitation of the same. In her book,The State Within a State. The KGB in Soviet Union, she even gives the file numbers of such intelligence files, which can now be accessed by any Indian government through a formal request to the Kremlin.

    The Russsian Government in 1992 was confronted by the Albats’ disclosure; they confirmed it through their official spokesperson to the press [which was published in Hindu in 1992], defending such financial payments as necessary in “Soviet ideological interest”.

    When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, things changed for Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Her patrons evaporated. The rump that became Russia was in a financial mess and disorder. So Ms. Sonia Gandhi became a supporter of another communist country to the annoyance of the Russians.

    The national security ramification of this ‘annoyance’ is now significant: The President of Russia today is Putin, a former dyed-in-the-wool KGB officer. Upon Dr. Manmohan Singh’s government taking office, Russia called back it’s career diplomat Ambassador in New Delhi and immediately posted as the new Ambassador a person who was the KGB station chief in New Delhi during the 1970s. In view of Dr. Albats confirmed revelation, it stands to reason that the new Ambassador would have known first hand about Sonia’s connections with the KGB. He may have in fact been her “controller”. The new Indian government which is defacto Sonia’s, cannot afford to annoy him or even disregard Russian demands coming from him? They will obviously placate him so as not to risk exposure. Is this not a major national security risk and a delicate matter for the nation?

    Of course, all Indians would like good normal and healthy relations with Russia. Who can forget their assistance to us in times of need? Today’s Russia is the residual legatee of that Soviet Union which helped India. But just because of that, should we tolerate those in our government set up having clandestine links with a foreign spy agency? In the United States, the government did not tolerate an American spying for Israel even though the two countries are as close as any two countries can be. National security and friendship are asdifferent as chalk and cheese.

    In December 2001, I had filed a Writ Petition in the Delhi High Court with the photocopies of the KGB documents, and sought a CBI investigation, which the Vajpayee Government was refusing. Earlier, Minister of State for CBI, Vasundara Raje [now Rajasthan CM], on my letter dated March 3, 2001, had ordered the CBI to investigate. But after Sonia Gandhi and her party stalled the proceedings of Parliament on this issue, the then Prime Minister Vajpayee cancelled Vasundara’s direction to the CBI.

    The Delhi High Court issued a direction to the CBI to ascertain from Russia the truth of my charges. The CBI procrastinated for three years, and finally told the Court without an FIR registered the Russians will not entertain any such query. But who stopped the CBI from registering an FIR? The next hearing of the case is on September 8th.

    ————–

    V

    After Sonia married Rajiv, she went about minting money with scant regard for Indian laws and treasures. Within a few years the Mainos went from utter poverty to billionaires. There was no area that was left out for the rip-off. On November 19, 1974, as fresh entrant to Parliament, I asked the then Prime Minister Ms. Indira Gandhi on the floor of the House if her daughter-in-law, Sonia Gandhi was acting as an insurance agent of a public sector insurance company [Oriental Fire & Insurance], giving the Prime Minister’s official residence as her business address, and using undue influence to insure all the officers of the PMO while remaining an Italian citizen [thus violating FERA]? There was uproar in Parliament, but Mrs. Indira Gandhi had no alternative but to cut her losses. She made a rare admission that it was so, and that it was by mistake, but that Sonia had resigned from her insurance agent status [after my question]. But Sonia was incorrigible. Her contempt for Indian law continued to manifest.

    The Justice A.C. Gupta Commission set up by the Janata Party government in 1977 came out with a voluminous report on the Maruti Company then owned by the Gandhi family, and has listed eight violations of FERA, Companies Act, and Foreigners Registration Act by Sonia Gandhi. She was never prosecuted, but can be still prosecuted because under Indian law, economic crimes not subject to the statute of limitation.

    In January 1980, Indira Gandhi returned as Prime Minister. The first thing Sonia did was to enroll herself as a voter. This was a gross violation of the law, enough to cause cancellation of her visa [since she was admittedly an Italian citizen then]. There was some hullabaloo in the press about it, so the Delhi Chief Electoral Officer got her name deleted in 1982. But in January 1983, she again enrolled herself as a voter! Such is her revealed disdain for Indian laws and that is her mindset even today.

    VI

    The bottom line observed in Sonia’s mindset is that she can always run back to Italy if she becomes vulnerable at anytime. In Peru, President Fujimori who all along claimed to be “born Peruvian”, faced with a corruption charge fled to Japan with his loot and reclaimed his Japanese citizenship.

    In 1977, when the Janata Party defeated the Congress at the polls, and formed the government, Sonia with her two children, abandoned Indira Gandhi and ran to the Italian Embassy in New Delhi and hid there. Rajiv Gandhi was a government servant then [as an Indian Airlines pilot], but he too tagged along and hid in that foreign embassy ! Such was her baneful influence on him. Rajiv did snap out Sonia’s influence after 1989, but alas he was assassinated before he could rectify it. Those close to Rajiv knew that he was planning set things right about Sonia after the 1991 elections. She did too know of it because he had told her. Ever wonder why Sonia’s closest advisers are those whom Rajiv literally hated? Ambika Soni is one such name. Ever wonder why she asked the President of India to set aside, on a mercy petition, the Supreme Court judgment directing that Rajiv Gandhi’s LTTE killers be hanged to death, when she was not similarly moved for Satwant Singh who killed Indira Gandhi or recently for Dhanajoy Chattopadhyaya? The explanation for this special consideration for the LTTE lies in what Rajiv had told her in 1990.

    Those who have no love for India will not hesitate to plunder her treasures. Mohammed Ghori, Nadir Shah, and the British scum in the East India Company made no secret of it. But Sonia Gandhi has been more discreet, but as greedy, in her looting of Indian treasures. When Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi were PrimeMinisters, not a day passed when the PM’s security did not go to the New Delhi, or Chennai international airport to send crates and crates unchecked by customs to Rome. Air India and Alitalia were the carriers. Mr. Arjun Singh first as CM, later as Union Minister in charge of Culture was her hatchet man. Indian temple sculpture of gods and goddesses, antiques, pichwai paintings, shatoosh shawls, coins, and you name it, were transported to Italy to be first displayed in two shops owned by her sister [ i.e., Anuskha alias Alessandra]. These shops located in blue-collar areas of Rivolta [shop name: Etnica] and Orbassano [shop name:Ganpati] did little business because which blue collar Italian wants Indian antiques? The shops were to make false bills, and thereafter these treasures were taken to London for auction by Sotheby’s and Christies. Some of this ill-gotten money from auction went into Rahul Gandhi’s National way into the Gandhi family account in the Bank of America in Cayman Islands.

    Rahul’s expenses and tuition fees for the one-year he was at Harvard, was paid from the Cayman Island account. What kind of people are these Gandhi-Mainos that bite the very hand of Bharat Mata that fed them and gave them a good life? How can the nation trust such greedy thieves?

    Since I failed to persuade the Vajpayee government to defend India’s treasures from plunder by the Mainos, I approached the Delhi High Court in a PIL. The first Bench of the court issued notice to the Government, but since the Indian government dragged it’s feet, the Court directed the CBI to seek Interpol’s and Italian government’s help. The Italian government justifiably asked for a Letter Rogatory for which a FIR is a pre-requisite. But the Interpol did oblige and submitted two voluminous reports, which the Court directed the CBI to hand over to me. But CBI has refused, and has claimed privilege! The CBI has also been caught lying in court by telling the judges that Alessandra Maino is a name of a man, and Via Bellini 14, Orbassano is a name of a village [not the street address of the Maino’s residence]. Although the CBI counsel had to apologise to the court stating he made a mistake, he has been promoted to Additional Solicitor General by the new government! The Vajpayee-Sonia mutual assistance pact is in full view. The case now comes up on September 8th.

    But the most sinister aspect of Sonia Gandhi’s character is her connection with terrorists. I am still working on it, but she has had long connection with the Habash group of Palestinian, and has funded Palestinian families that lost their kith and kin in a suicide bombing or hijacking episode. This, Rajiv Gandhi himself told me and was confirmed to me [the funding] by Yassir Arafat when I met him in Tunis on October 17, 1990 at the request of Rajiv Gandhi. Rajiv Gandhi and I were good friends from 1978, but became very close buddies after V.P. Singh had betrayed him in 1987. We met practically every day, mostly in the early hours from 1AM to 4AM. It was at my suggestion that he made Chandrashekhar the PM. And contrary to public impression, he was not mainly responsible for the fall of Chandrashekar government in which I was a Minister.

    Besides the Palestinian extremists, the Maino family have had extensive business dealings with Saddam Hussein, and surprisingly with the LTTE [“the Tamil Tigers”] since 1984. Sonia’s mother Paola Predebon Maino, and businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi were the main contacts with the Tigers. The mother used the LTTE for money laundering and Quattrocchi for selling weapons to earn commissions.

    Sonia’s conduit to the LTTE has been and is through Arjun Singh who uses Bangalore as the nodal point for contact. There is a string of circumstantial evidence pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino family may have contracted the LTTE to kill Rajiv Gandhi. The family may have assured the LTTE that nothing would happen to them because they would ensure it is blamed on the Sikhs or the evidence so much fudged that no court would convict them. But D.R. Karthikeyan of the CBI who led the SIT
    investigation got the support of Narasimha Rao and cracked the case, and got the LTTE convicted in the trial court, and which conviction was upheld in the Supreme Court.

    Although on the involvement of Congress Party in the assassination, DRK soft peddled on a number of leads perhaps because he did not want political controversy to put roadblocks on his investigation as a whole. The Justice J. S. Verma Commission, which was set up as the last official act of the Chandrashekhar government before demitting office on June 21, 1991, did find that the Congress leaders had disrupted the security arrangements for the Sriperumbudur meeting. The Commission wanted further probe into it but the Rao government rejected that demand. In the meantime under Sonia’s pressure, the Jain Commission was set up by the Rao government, which tried to muddy the waters and thus exonerate the LTTE. But the trial court judgment convicting the LTTE came earlier, and that sinister effort too failed.

    Nowadays, Sonia is quite unabashed in having political alliance with those who praise Rajiv Gandhi’s killers. No Indian widow would ever do that. My investigations into Sonia’s involvement in Rajiv’s assassination is therefore still on. I am also author of a best seller titled Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi,Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries [published by Konark in 2000] in which I have given some indications.

    Is it not significant that the political career of Sonia Gandhi advances concomitantly with a series of assassinations and apparently accidental deaths? How did Sanjay’s plane nosedive to a crash and yet the fuselage not explode? There was no fuel! Why was there no inquiry conducted? Is it not a fact that Indira Gandhi died because of loss of blood from the wounds and not directly due to a bullet impacting her head or heart? Then is it not strange that Sonia had insisted that the bleeding Indira be driven to Lohia Hospital — in the opposite direction to AIIMS, which had a contingency protocol set up for precisely suchan event? And after reaching Lohia Hospital, did not Sonia change her mind and demand that they all drive to AIIMS thus losing 24 valuable minutes.

    The same kind of mystery surrounds the sudden deaths of Sonia’s other political roadblocks such as Rajesh Pilot, Jitendra Prasad, and Madhavrao Scindia. Such things happened in the dark ages in Italy. Should we allow it India like dumb cattle?

    What Can We Do?

    We have to ensure that the Maino clan does not stay in power. Dr. Manmohan Singh may be PM, which is a small relief, but he is not a fighter. The real power in government today is wielded by the Maino mafia gang. Can they be dethroned?

    In Indian democracy, only a shocking scandal can unseat a government other than by losing majority. Today’s priority is not for toppling the Congress government as such since Manmohan Singh is a decent and scholarly person, but in driving the Maino clan out of India. It will however not be long before Sonia will give Manmohan Singh marching orders, and he will march out meekly. We should not expect him to resist.

    With Sonia’s defacto government in place, it is also unrealistic to expect that I can get an early victory in the courts on the KGB and antique smuggling cases.

    The most potent weapon therefore to dislodge the Maino clan [including Rahul and Priyanka] is by exposing their Italian citizenship. In 1992, Sonia revived her citizenship of Italy under Article 17 of the Italian Citizenship Law [Act 91 of 1992]. Rahul and Priyanka were born Italian citizens because Sonia was Italian when she gave birth to them [Italian law based on jure sanguinis]. Hence, they continue be Italians since they never renounced it. Both have been traveling abroad on Italian passports. They may now acquire Venezuela passports since Rahul’s girl friend Veronica is a Venezuelan. That means one more foreign bahu for us tolerant Indians. The Maino-Gandhis are certainly getting globalized. So what can patriotic Indians do?

    There is an urgent need to document these facts on notarized paper, for which we need a network in London, Milan, Hongkong and Venezuela. Those persuaded by my above stated facts and arguments may join in and help set up this network.

    Westminister Bank and Hongkong & Shanghai Bank, London accounts, but most of it found it’s

    Patriotic Indians should thank the President of India for having the courage by citing a legal hitch to dissuade Ms. Sonia Gandhi from staking her claim to form the government in May this year. She therefore did not as expected on May 17th become the Prime Minister of 1 billion plus people of India. It can now be said that the nation has been saved from a monumental, devastating, and permanent injury to India’s national interest and patriotic psyche of Indians. And therefore every effort that can be made in a democracy should be made to ensure that Ms. Sonia Gandhi is permanently out of reckoning for any public office. For those who instinctively understand that, this Note is to explain the factual basis for this conclusion, and suggest what patriotic Indians can do now .

    My opposition to Ms. Sonia Gandhi is not merely because she is Italian—born. In other democratic countries, including in Italy, such an issue [of foreign-born aspiring to be head of government] would not even arise at all because the issue has already been settled by law, that a person cannot hold the highest public office unless he or she is native born.

    In India there is no such law, but the President according to my knowledge, correctly acted on a proviso to Section 5 of the Indian Citizenship Act[1955] which empowers the Union Home Ministry to lay down conditions that apply to Indian citizenship acquired by foreigners by registration, which conditions would be based on the principle of reciprocity, viz., in Ms Gandhi’s case such of those conditions that apply to Indians on becoming citizens of Italy would apply to her.

    The President reportedly told her that if she insisted on being invited to form the government, he would want first to clarify, on a reference to the Supreme Court, whether in view of this proviso her appointment as PM could be successfully challenged in the court. It is fair to assume that this report of the President’s decision, is correct since the President had before him my petition dated May 15, 2004 making just that point— that Ms. Gandhi’s citizenship is conditional, and in particular she cannot be the PM legally. The President had also given me an appointment at 12.45 PM on May 17, 2004 to explain my submissions in person, which I did. I also told him that I would challenge such a constitutional appointment in the Supreme Court just as I had in 2001 when the Tamil Nadu Governor illegally swore in Ms Jayalalitha as Chief Minister.

    In that case, the Supreme Court had after hearing me and many other institutional luminaries, upheld my contention that mere majority in the House is insufficient for being sworn in to a constitutional office. There must be no disqualification as well. Ms. Jayalalitha had therefore to step down because she was disqualified by a conviction handed by a trial court in the TANSI corruption case filed by me as private complaint [she subsequently was acquitted by the Madras High Court, and hence became eligible the next year]. I also cited to the President a 1962 Allahabad High Court case, which held that this proviso in the Citizenship Act was binding and lawful.

    The nation in the Sonia matter has thus got an unexpected but temporary reprieve, a reprieve received not only because her citizenship of India by registration is not equal to one by birth even by Indian law, but also a reprieve more because of what national security risk was averted. To comprehend that risk, we must first understand who Sonia Gandhi really is and what danger she, her family and her friends in Italy hold for India’s national security.

    Even for an Indian born citizen, we find it difficult to know a person’s true background, but for an Italian born it is extremely hard because of the remote access for most people to Italy in language and familiarity. This note is about that danger that Sonia represents to the nation, which the people need to know.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *